University Staff: APS 5009 provides a performance rating system for university staff as a critical component of the university's performance management system for effective resource management and employee development.Ìý This policy statement provides the guidelines for annual performance evaluation and planning in accordance with the use of the revised 5-point performance rating formÌý
Ìý
Far exceeds performance expectations on a consistent and uniform basis. Work is of exceptional quality in all essential areas of responsibility. In addition, makes an exceptional or unique contribution in achievement of unit, department, and university objectives.
Ìý
Always achieves performance expectations and frequently exceeds them. Demonstrates performance of a very high level of quality in all areas of responsibility.
Fails to meet expectations in more than two of the significant/ essential position requirements and improvement is needed in most aspects of the position.
ÌýÌýÌý
Performance that needs improvement or is otherwise unacceptable as documented in the annual evaluation shall result in a performance improvement plan and/or a corrective action or Letter of Expectation and a reasonable amount of time to improve unless the employee is already under performance improvement, corrective or disciplinary action for the same performance matter. If needs improvement or unacceptable performance relates to a recurring performance issue that has resulted in a prior corrective action or disciplinary action, the appointing authority may take disciplinary action concurrently with issuing the annual evaluation. The appointing authority may proceed immediately to disciplinary action, up to and including immediate termination, if the act is so flagrant or serious that immediate discipline is proper.Ìý