兔子先生传媒文化作品

We鈥檝e all been there: You鈥檙e talking to someone鈥攎aybe a relative or a neighbor鈥攁bout politics. Your face gets flushed. Your hands start to shake. You can鈥檛 believe anyone could possibly be so thickheaded.

Matthew Koschmann, associate professor in the Department of Communication at 兔子先生传媒文化作品, knows all about those difficult kinds of conversations. He notes that talking to someone you don鈥檛 agree with during a fraught election year can be uncomfortable or even infuriating. But there are a few strategies that anyone can take to keep the dialogue civil鈥攁nd maybe even come to a place of deeper understanding.

Koschmann touched on these challenges at a recent panel discussion in Boulder called 鈥淓lection year polarization: Can we stay good neighbors?鈥� First off, he said, you need to realize that you probably won鈥檛 change anyone鈥檚 mind through talking alone.

鈥淐onversations aren鈥檛 just about abstract ideas or strategies,鈥� he said. 鈥淭hey鈥檙e about real people with real hormones and emotions in real circumstances.鈥�

He gives his take on why being in tune with your own body is critical and how to survive a conservation with that one uncle.

A lot of us may assume that we can win people over with the perfect argument centered on logic and facts. Do you think that鈥檚 true?

Of course, logic and reasoning are very important, but it tends to be contextual. A lot of interaction environments have boundaries and rules, like in a courtroom. There are very strict rules on who can talk, when they can talk, what they're allowed to say. That interaction environment privileges certain ways of making decisions, particularly based on evidence, reasoning and expertise. 听

But in the public sphere, there aren鈥檛 really a lot of rules. You're not required to agree with somebody just because they presented a better argument. Reason and rationality are just some of many factors that contribute to how we make decisions.

Is it possible to change peoples鈥� minds?

In this kind of free-for-all of the public sphere, or the Thanksgiving table, issues of identity, narrative, affection or affinity, emotion and sense of belonging are very important. And when those things are threatened or challenged, no amount of facts is going to necessarily change people's minds. We're going to dig in and, if anything, double down on our positions.

We often hear: 鈥楶eople want compromise.鈥� But, usually, compromise is what everybody wants other people to do. It鈥檚 not necessarily what we are willing to do ourselves. Most of us just aren't that willing to change our beliefs and values.

So how can we approach these kinds of conversations?

First of all, I think it's important to have a sober-minded assessment of what is actually at stake and what鈥檚 actually possible. As an example, we just had some relatives in town, a wonderful family visit. It seems clich茅, but these issues came up with one of my uncles who has political views that are different than mine.

But we had a good-hearted conversation. Part of that was that I came in knowing that he lives in Texas. Even if I completely convert him, which I鈥檓 not going to do, nothing changes in the election, and the same is true for me here in Colorado.

What if the conversation starts becoming heated?

A good way to approach that is through a concept scholars call 鈥榓ppreciative inquiry.鈥� We may never agree, but we can ask some genuine questions: 鈥業 don't see it that way, but I want to, at least, understand. Tell me how you came to hold that view? What are some experiences in your life that shaped your politics?鈥�

We can also practice the principle of reciprocity. Persuasion tends to happen when there's a lot of give and take. I've had a lot of success by asking people, 鈥楬ey, is there something you you've read or a video you've seen that maybe I should watch to understand? Maybe we can talk about it sometime.鈥�

I don鈥檛 say, 鈥楾hen I've got something for you to read,鈥� but most of the time, people will ask.

What happens when the stakes of a conversation become genuinely high?

There are situations where there is a lot at stake, where there are power imbalances between the parties involved鈥攚hether it's an employment relationship or a family relationship. When we get into the case of, for example, a parent telling a child: 鈥業f you continue to believe this, I'm not going to pay your tuition,鈥� we鈥檙e in a different realm. That鈥檚 no longer a dialogue. That鈥檚 now in the realm of conflict resolution, therapy, family intervention.

At the event, you talked about being aware of your own body. Why is that important?

It鈥檚 so much easier to talk about this stuff in the abstract. It is totally different when you're the one in the conversation. Your stress levels are elevated. Your physiology is triggering fight-or-flight scenarios that are making it difficult to think through constructive answers.

What do we do then?

A really important practical life skill is to practice managing your responses, your reactions in that physiological space. The classroom can be a great place to simulate that鈥攊f you get up in front of a group, your physiology changes.听

When I鈥檓 feeling anxiety, when I'm about to give a presentation, I try to recognize: Here it comes. I practice my breathing, practice control, regulate my pulse.